|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
26
   |
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
You're preaching to the choir. I was opposed to making Concord invincible and inescapable. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Awoxing belongs in the realm of nullsec supercap fleets. Ganking belongs no where, since it means you're defying the GAME MECHANICS.
Gankers are not defying the game mechanics. The game mechanics are specifically designed to allow ganking to happen. This isn't a WoW PvE server. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tesal wrote:Crumplecorn wrote:Tesal wrote:But CCP does cater to me. They try to figure out what will be fun for me. The game isn't an immaculate entity divorced from player opinion. If catering to you involves corrupting what makes this game unique to provide you with something you can get elsewhere, they shouldn't. That's rather the point of this entire thread. EvE is a game of the good guys versus the bad guys, however who is good and bad is a matter of perspective. What I find appealing might seem corrupt to you and vice a versa.
He obviously didn't mean "corrupting" in a moral sense you halfwit. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Joran Dravius wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:
Awoxing belongs in the realm of nullsec supercap fleets. Ganking belongs no where, since it means you're defying the GAME MECHANICS.
Gankers are not defying the game mechanics. The game mechanics are specifically designed to allow ganking to happen. This isn't a WoW PvE server. Perhaps it should be. EVE is dying. Obviously with alphaganking, simply making concord even faster (they're already invulnerable) isn't going to cut it, so let's just cut to the chase and cut the gankers out of highsec.
Eve is not dying. The population is continuing to rise, as it always has. Check the all time weekly average. http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility It took a slight did and is now on its way up again. Look at the past year. It's higher now than it was a year ago. Past 6 months? Same. Every chart shows growth. STFU unless you're going to say something that isn't complete fiction. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Joran Dravius wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Joran Dravius wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:
Awoxing belongs in the realm of nullsec supercap fleets. Ganking belongs no where, since it means you're defying the GAME MECHANICS.
Gankers are not defying the game mechanics. The game mechanics are specifically designed to allow ganking to happen. This isn't a WoW PvE server. Perhaps it should be. EVE is dying. Obviously with alphaganking, simply making concord even faster (they're already invulnerable) isn't going to cut it, so let's just cut to the chase and cut the gankers out of highsec. Eve is not dying. The population is continuing to rise, as it always has. Check the all time weekly average. http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility It took a slight dip and is now on its way up again. Look at the past year. It's higher now than it was a year ago. Past 6 months? Same. Every chart shows growth. STFU unless you're going to say something that isn't complete fiction. My my. EVEO, want to defend your views which I have seen espoused here so frequently? As a goon it is not possible for anyone to trust me to carry your argument for you without somehow trying to get a metagame advantage from it.
Carry my argument for me? You were just saying you wanted gankers removed because Eve is "dying" and I replied because I didn't notice it was posted by the idiot brigade. If I had it my way Eve would go back to how it was when I started. Concord would be killable and escapable. I'd remove jump drives to keep freighters full of goodies from teleporting past gate camps while I was at it. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 05:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:EVE is dying. Obviously with alphaganking, simply making concord even faster (they're already invulnerable) isn't going to cut it, so let's just cut to the chase and cut the gankers out of highsec. What if CONCORD got all "Minority Report" on the gankers... You press F1 and before your guns fire some CONCORD death ray just blasts your ****. I think that would make EVE a much happier place.
I agree, but only if you press F1 with a mining laser equipped. |
Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
37
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 04:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sariah Kion wrote:Joran Dravius wrote:
Carry my argument for me? You were just saying you wanted gankers removed because Eve is "dying" and I replied because I didn't notice it was posted by the idiot brigade. If I had it my way Eve would go back to how it was when I started. Concord would be killable and escapable. I'd remove jump drives to keep freighters full of goodies from teleporting past gate camps while I was at it.
The game grows because things like that were balanced out of the game. Carebears and mixed playstyles are allowing the game to grow but misguided players want to cut that away. For shame. Ganker mouth breather, for shame. Dont let these null sec masters of deception and misinformation lead you around by the nose. Who will you gank when there is no one left to gank? Puppet Masters at work. The dogs are hunting. Juice is a source of sugar. Do your homework.
Firstly, why do you assume I'm a ganker? I don't even like to be in high any more than I have to. They might as well change its name to WoW sec. Secondly, I assume i'd be killing the same sorts of people I was before the change in question happened. Finally, why do you think turning Eve into a WoW clone will be good for the game despite numerous examples of it having the exact opposite effect in other games? |
|
|
| |
|